Lately, what seems to be “trending” online, re-tweeted or
shared on FB seems to be a fair litmus test for what’s on people’s minds. So
when a seemingly innocuous piece from a publication I’m willing to bet almost
none of you read on a daily basis got a shocking amount of recirculation and
sharing at least within my circle of friends, it got me thinking. The article
was from The Atlantic (read it lately? exactly –didn’t think so) but I bet you
read the article: “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All.” It’s a smartly written
and illuminating piece by Anne-Marie Slaughter documenting her experience
reaching the pinnacle of her professional experience and saying explicitly that
the trade-offs between work and family are real. She goes on to discuss how the
younger generation seems more keenly aware of these pitfalls and is
consequently less likely to as aggressively pursue the very highest rung of
their respective professional ladders, as they suffer no disillusion about
their ability to “have it all.” Slaughter of course is right and we all know
it, and her piece raises interesting questions about what we need to have in
place to strike a better balance between work and family, and to make the
sacrifices and trade-offs less obvious and extreme.
I have a good friend who knows this experience well. She has
been at her company a long time. She is smart, hard-working, and well-deserving
of the promotion that should have come to her years ago. Still, she realizes
that by aggressively fighting for and getting it, she may be signing up for a
trade-off she’s not willing to make. Does she want the promotion more than the
ability to leave at 5pm every day and be home for dinner with her girls at 6pm?
Is the professional success she’s earned worth the fundamental loss of personal
flexibility her work schedule currently affords her? While I’m currently a stay
at home Mom, I sympathized with her largely because my husband is currently
struggling with the same scenario. He has aggressively pursued his promotion
over the past year, but done so at a high price. The travel, the hours – the writing
was clear: work first, everything else later. Ultimately, he got the promotion
and was happy, sort of. But also kind of miserable because he’d spent the past
year doing nothing but working and missed his home, his family, his kids –
himself.
So it struck that me what we are really talking about here
is not really just a working mom conundrum but a working parent problem and the
greater question as a society that we have to answer, is how can we incentivize
and educate our corporate culture on the idea that efficiency, more than hours
clocked, and miles logged, matters more to their bottom line. What systems can
we share out to promote the idea of working smart, not working long so that
being effective and high performing in the office, doesn’t mean checking out at
home?
I’ve always said that happy mamas make happy babies but I
think the same fundamental precept is true here again: happy people make happy
and ultimately productive workers. It’s time that we as a culture stop thinking
in terms of trade offs and start structuring our time in non-traditional and
more efficient ways to encourage working parents to go for that brass ring,
while still being able to make the last out of their kid’s game. This group of
women and men are struggling and subsequently stifling their potential
contributions and innovation both at work and home. The problem is not unique to women. Increasing
flexible schedules and thinking on both ends will unlock our potential to be
both great parents and leaders.
Here Here! It's not that women can't have it all, men can't either right now.
ReplyDelete